Crews 622-J-01 through 622-J-08 and 704-O-01 through 704-O-08

Contingent Participant Survey

Before departing Philmont, your crew leadership completed surveys that were relative to your experience while at Philmont.  This survey relates to the Capitol Area Council’s Philmont Contingent — not the Philmont experience itself.  We appreciate your candid response to this survey — it will help us improve in the future.  You may or may not identify yourself but, in any event, all responses will remain confidential. 

Some of the questions on the survey form are applicable only to the adult Crew Advisors (Crew Advisor Binder).  Others are applicable to any participant.  Please respond to those questions that apply to you or that you have personal knowledge of.

On this form, check the boxes if your response is "Yes", leave them blank if "No."  Where a ranking is available, respond "1" for "Strongly Disagree" through "5" for "Strongly Agree."

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey and thank you for providing the Scouting and Philmont experience to your crew.

About Yourself (optional):

Expedition Number

Name

E-mail Address:

 

Please provide the following:

Crew Position

Scouting Position

First Philmont Trek?

First Council Contingent?

First High Adventure Leadership Experience?

          Check for yes

             Check for yes

                          Check for yes

The following relates to the overall Contingent experience:

Should the contingent provide maps to all participants?

Remarks:

Check for yes


 

How did you like the duffle bags?

         Did not like              Liked
                                       very much

1   2   3   4   5


Remarks:
 

Should the design of the Contingent Shoulder strip remain the same from year to year (change only the year)?

Remarks:                   

Check for yes


 

Should the contingent provide the Contingent logo patch to participants?

Remarks:                        

Check for yes


 

What other amenities would you like the Contingent to include for participants?

The following relates to the Contingent’s organizational activities and information:

The three organizational meetings were adequate?

Disagree              Agree
1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

Information/notifications received by e-mail were adequate?

Disagree              Agree
1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

Information on the Contingent website was useful?

Disagree              Agree
1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

What sections of the Contingent website were most useful?




Remarks:

 


 




 

General Information:
   Itinerary Selection

  Philmont Rules/Policies

  Medical Considerations

  Equipment lists

  Hints/suggestions

2007 Contingent Section:

  Advisor Checklist, paperwork status

  Crew information

  Timeline/Schedule

  Financial

  Meeting Information/Presentations

  Contingent Logo

  Contact Information

The Crew Advisor Binder was useful?

Disagree              Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

What sections of the Crew Advisor binder were most useful?


Remarks:

 


 


 

Binder Sections:
   Philmont Base Camp

  Travel/Transportation

  General Information

  Paperwork

  Other

Binder Information:

  Council & Unit Planning Guide

  TREKS 2005 book

  2005 Guidebook to Adventure

  CD-ROM

  New Mexico Vacation Guide book

What other information should be included in the Crew Advisor binder?

The following relates to the Contingent’s application process:

I had no problem getting the Contingent application forms?

Disagree              Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

 How did you obtain the Contingent application forms? Remarks:





  Received in mail from Council

  Downloaded from website

  Picked up at Council service center

  Received from someone in my unit

  Other

The Contingent application form was understandable?

Disagree                          Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

Information on how to complete and submit the application form was understandable?

Disagree              Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

What suggestions do you have regarding making the Contingent application process better?

The following relates to the financial aspects of the Contingent:

The cost of $780 per participant and $9,360 per crew is reasonable?

Disagree           Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

Participants received good value for their $780 expenditure?

Disagree           Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

I had no problems/issues making the payments at the Council office.

Disagree           Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The payment schedule was reasonable and understandable.

Disagree           Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

I had all the information I needed relative to Philmont scholarships.

Disagree           Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The following relates to the Contingent transportation:

The bus equipment was clean and operated to expectations?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The bus drivers were courteous and knowledgeable?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The trip should continue to be made in one day with no overnight stops?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

Trip TO Philmont:

On the trip to Philmont, the lunch meal at Texas Tech was adequate?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

On the trip to Philmont, the lunch meal at NM Highlands University was adequate?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The snacks on the bus trip to Philmont were adequate and appropriate?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The drinks on the bus trip to Philmont were adequate and appropriate?

Disagree                          Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

Trip home FROM Philmont:

On the trip home from Philmont, the lunch meal at Ci-Ci’s Pizza was adequate?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

On the trip home from Philmont, the lunch meal at McMurray University was adequate?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The snacks on the bus trip from Philmont were adequate and appropriate?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

The drinks on the bus trip from Philmont were adequate and appropriate?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

What suggestions do you have that could improve the Contingent travel?

The following relates to the Contingent’s paperwork requirements:

I understood the paperwork requirements for the Contingent and was able to communicate this to my crew participants?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

I thought the paperwork required for the Contingent was appropriate and had no difficulty in gathering it?

Disagree               Agree
 1   2   3   4   5

Remarks:

What suggestions do you have that could improve the Contingent paperwork process?

Please provide some one-line quotes that can be used for future Contingent crews:

How would you characterize the Contingent experience?

How would you characterize your specific expedition?

How would you characterize the Philmont experience?

This summer, a large number of people thought Philmont was "just a two-week summer camp."  Can you provide a quote that will help communicate the difficulty of a Philmont trek relative to other camping/high adventure activities?

What one piece of advice would you give to a Crew Advisor going to Philmont for the first time?
 

Thank you for completing this survey form.  Your input will help the council's future contingent crew advisors and participants.

Clicking the "Submit" button will e-mail your responses to Sid Covington.  If you would prefer, you may print the page and fill it out manually.  These should be mailed to:

            Sid Covington

            4810 Placid Place

            Austin, TX 78731

 If you have any questions, feel free to contact Sid by e-mail or at 512-925-1231.